THE RORT · DOSSIER · RANDWICK CITY COUNCILSTATUS · LOCAL · TRACKED
DOSSIER / ACTORLOCAL COUNCIL

Randwick City Council

Status Local · tracked

An eastern-Sydney council whose Kensington-to-Kingsford corridor has filled with student beds, and whose planning agreements trade height for cash.

Last on record
2026-09
Named in
5 articles
Across
3 cases

Named in 5 articles across 3 cases 9 connections: mechanisms 5, councils and panels 3, courts 1

Key figure on file
4 May and 15 May 2026
Both applicants appealed before the panel ever sat. The second, on 15 May 2026, was lodged under section 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assess…
5
Articles naming it
3
Cases it recurs across
9
Linked in the graph
2
Figures on file

Fig. 01 / Where this name appears

Fig. 01Source: article scan · every article naming itAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

Fig. 02 / On the record

  1. 4 May and 15 May 2026Both applicants appealed before the panel ever sat. The second, on 15 May 2026, was lodged under section 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the business paper records the matter as before the Court as Greenfort Project Developments Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council (LEC 2026/201070). The same report notes that a request for further information was issued, and that "No amended plans addressing these matters were submitted prior to the commencement of Court proceedings."Accepted in principle, refused in public →
  2. 9 September 2026The NSW Online Registry court list, retrieved on 3 September 2026, shows case 2026/00201070, Greenfort Project Developments Pty Ltd v Randwick City Council, in the Land and Environment Court, listed for 12.00pm on 9 September 2026 as an online court event requiring a request, court room unassigned. The listing carries an online court active flag, with a last activity timestamp of 17 August 2026, four days after the panel refused the application. The court title spells the applicant "Developments"; the panel business paper spells it "Development".Accepted in principle, refused in public →
Fig. 02Source: figures on file for this name, each tied to the article it came fromAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

How we know

The sources of the 5 articles that name Randwick City Council, by the tier the desk declared. A source supports its article, not necessarily a claim about Randwick City Council.

Evidence strength · 32 sources across 5 articles
  • Primary 21
  • Official 2
  • Masthead 4
  • Trade 4
  • 1 not yet graded
Primary
the document itself: legislation, a court record, a filing, a regulator’s own publication
Official
the organisation’s own statement about itself
Masthead
a news organisation with a corrections policy, reporting the primary document
Trade
specialist or trade press
How sources are graded

3 of 5 articles are graded on every headline finding. How findings are graded

Fig. 03 / Named together

Randwick City CouncilDeemed Refusal: named together in 4 articlesDeemed Refusal4The Democratic Bypass: named together in 4 articlesThe Democratic Bypass4The Land and Environment Court: named together in 4 articlesThe Land and Environment Court4Voluntary Planning Agreements: named together in 4 articlesVoluntary Planning Agreements4Sydney Eastern City Planning Panel: named together in 3 articlesSydney Eastern City Planning Panel3The Housing SEPP: named together in 3 articlesThe Housing SEPP3Waverley Council: named together in 2 articlesWaverley Council2Shellharbour City Council: named together in 1 articleShellharbour City Council1Suppression Orders: named together in 1 articleSuppression Orders1
The 9 names most often in the same articles as Randwick City Council. A line's weight, and the number by each name, is how many articles name both. Grey chords join the neighbours most often named together themselves (two articles or more). Circles are people and organisations, squares are mechanisms. Named together is all this shows: it is not a finding about what the relationship is.
Fig. 03Source: article scan · articles naming bothAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

How this page is assembled. The name, status and role are the desk's entity record. The article list, case counts, connections and the figures under On the record are read by script from the published articles that name Randwick City Council: the desk's key figures where it declared them, otherwise figures harvested from those articles. A connection is a name that appears in the same articles; it is not a finding about the relationship. Under How we know, the sources are those articles' references, counted once each and tiered only where the desk declared a tier; a grade beside an article is its weakest headline finding, shown only where every headline finding is graded. The page is rebuilt when an article is published or changed.

← THE DOCKET