THE RORT · DOSSIER · CHARGE EVENTSSTATUS · PRICED, NOT PUBLISHED
DOSSIER / MECHANISMMECHANISM · CONTRACT

Charge Events

Status Priced, not published

The pricing layer of a prison management deed. Twenty five performance indicators and four Charge Events, with an unnatural death in custody and an escape from secure custody each charged at $500,000, and, in the reports searched on 19 October 2026, no consolidated total.

Last on record
2026-09
Named in
1 article
Across
1 case

Named in 1 article across 1 case 3 connections: companies 1, regulators and bodies 1, agencies and departments 1

Key figure on file
$500,000
The charge to the operator for an unnatural death in custody, as the 2022 report states it. That report records that "While cause of death is subject…
1
Articles naming it
1
Cases it recurs across
3
Linked in the graph
1
Figures on file

Fig. 01 / Where this name appears

Fig. 01Source: article scan · every article naming itAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

Fig. 02 / On the record

  1. $500,000The charge to the operator for an unnatural death in custody, as the 2022 report states it. That report records that "While cause of death is subject to determination by the Coroner, the contract states that unnatural causes include homicide, suicide, accident and drug overdose." Escapes carry the same price at the top end, under Schedule 11 of the deed: "Each escape from secure custody results in a charge of $500,000." Each escape from open custody is charged at $200,000. For the other two Charge Events, major disruption to the operation of the correctional complex and compliance with release dates, no price has been published.Every failure listed, none priced →
Fig. 02Source: figures on file for this name, each tied to the article it came fromAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

How we know

The sources of the 1 article that names Charge Events, by the tier the desk declared. A source supports its article, not necessarily a claim about Charge Events.

Evidence strength · 17 sources across 1 article
  • Primary 14
  • Official 2
  • 1 not yet graded
Primary
the document itself: legislation, a court record, a filing, a regulator’s own publication
Official
the organisation’s own statement about itself
How sources are graded

0 of 1 article are graded on every headline finding. How findings are graded

Fig. 03 / Named together

Charge EventsCorrective Services NSW: named together in 1 articleCorrective Services NSW1MTC Australia: named together in 1 articleMTC Australia1The Inspector of Custodial Services: named together in 1 articleThe Inspector of Custodial Services1
The 3 names most often in the same articles as Charge Events. A line's weight, and the number by each name, is how many articles name both. Grey chords join the neighbours most often named together themselves (two articles or more). Circles are people and organisations, squares are mechanisms. Named together is all this shows: it is not a finding about what the relationship is.
Fig. 03Source: article scan · articles naming bothAs of 2026‑09Auto-assembled

How this page is assembled. The name, status and role are the desk's entity record. The article list, case counts, connections and the figures under On the record are read by script from the published articles that name Charge Events: the desk's key figures where it declared them, otherwise figures harvested from those articles. A connection is a name that appears in the same articles; it is not a finding about the relationship. Under How we know, the sources are those articles' references, counted once each and tiered only where the desk declared a tier; a grade beside an article is its weakest headline finding, shown only where every headline finding is graded. The page is rebuilt when an article is published or changed.

← THE DOCKET